Kyle Nix

Discuss here topics Bradford City related. Any breach of rules will result in permanant bans. Current users are warned that a VALID email address must be added to their profile within 14 days. Failure to do will result in membership being closed.

Kyle Nix

Postby Robert Roberston on Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:35 pm

Another one who would have done a job this season, but not liked by those who shouldnt be interfering in team affairs. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Robert Roberston
 
Posts: 2559
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:07 pm

Re: Kyle Nix

Postby shartle_861 on Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:37 pm

Robert Roberston wrote:Another one who would have done a job this season, but not liked by those who shouldnt be interfering in team affairs. :roll: :roll: :roll:


for once RR I agree with you 100%
User avatar
shartle_861
 
Posts: 6182
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:23 pm
Location: A hundred plus miles away from VP

Re: Kyle Nix

Postby Robert Roberston on Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:38 pm

shartle_861 wrote:
Robert Roberston wrote:Another one who would have done a job this season, but not liked by those who shouldnt be interfering in team affairs. :roll: :roll: :roll:


for once RR I agree with you 100%


I'm starting to see your point about Bully as well. :oops: :oops: :oops: :cry: :cry:
Robert Roberston
 
Posts: 2559
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:07 pm

Re: Kyle Nix

Postby youngvet on Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:39 pm

Brandon in disguise.
youngvet
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:13 pm

Re: Kyle Nix

Postby ETN on Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:40 pm

Far better all round player than Brandon.
ETN
 
Posts: 1643
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 7:49 pm

Re: Kyle Nix

Postby youngvet on Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:43 pm

Same MO . Flattered to decieve!
youngvet
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:13 pm

Re: Kyle Nix

Postby Bantam_Jay on Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:50 pm

Very good player IMO. Gave 100%, was a decent footballer and chipped in with his fair share of goals. His only problem was his lack of pace. Not a winger, best suited to playing central in an attacking role.
Bantam_Jay
 
Posts: 1996
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:24 pm

Re: Kyle Nix

Postby NorthernMonkey on Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:55 pm

Robert Roberston wrote:Another one who would have done a job this season, but not liked by those who shouldnt be interfering in team affairs. :roll: :roll: :roll:


I liked him and was probably one of his biggest supporters when it looked like he wasn't being offered another contract BUT the question has to be asked, why hasn't he found himself another league club?
User avatar
NorthernMonkey
 
Posts: 5184
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: Queensbury

Re: Kyle Nix

Postby Bantam_Jay on Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:57 pm

NorthernMonkey wrote:
Robert Roberston wrote:Another one who would have done a job this season, but not liked by those who shouldnt be interfering in team affairs. :roll: :roll: :roll:


I liked him and was probably one of his biggest supporters when it looked like he wasn't being offered another contract BUT the question has to be asked, why hasn't he found himself another league club?


As far as I know he had options in this league but Mansfield were the first to give him a trial and put on an offer on the table. He's a young lad you can't blame him for taking it. Their fans seem to love him anyway.
Bantam_Jay
 
Posts: 1996
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:24 pm

Re: Kyle Nix

Postby clayton bantam on Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:57 pm

Decent player who contibuted as much as people earning probably 3 times his wage but probably not good enough to start for a team supposedly aiming for promotion. One of the problems for me was that in the system we used he wasn't quite fast enough to play as a winger and not physical and strong enough to play in central midfield.
User avatar
clayton bantam
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:13 pm

Re: Kyle Nix

Postby shartle_861 on Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:59 pm

Robert Roberston wrote:
shartle_861 wrote:
Robert Roberston wrote:Another one who would have done a job this season, but not liked by those who shouldnt be interfering in team affairs. :roll: :roll: :roll:


for once RR I agree with you 100%


I'm starting to see your point about Bully as well. :oops: :oops: :oops: :cry: :cry:
:


I am warming to you Robert,seems we have the same sence of wicked humour :roll: :roll: :roll:
User avatar
shartle_861
 
Posts: 6182
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:23 pm
Location: A hundred plus miles away from VP

Re: Kyle Nix

Postby youngvet on Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:01 pm

Exactly !
youngvet
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:13 pm

Re: Kyle Nix

Postby park bantam on Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:01 pm

Robert Roberston wrote:Another one who would have done a job this season, but not liked by those who shouldnt be interfering in team affairs. :roll: :roll: :roll:

I wish the certain so and so had interferd more with regard to bringing experienced help in because he was right
park bantam
 
Posts: 5102
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 1:59 pm

Re: Kyle Nix

Postby Bigfoot on Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:08 pm

Robert Roberston wrote:Another one who would have done a job this season, but not liked by those who shouldnt be interfering in team affairs. :roll: :roll: :roll:

Its weird I know fans have different viewpoints Nix was a good player but the central midfield has been superb with Bullock and Flynn.
The wingers have been shayte compared to last seasons embarrassment of riches. Note Daley has been out most of the time.
Bigfoot
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:15 pm

Re: Kyle Nix

Postby shartle_861 on Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:09 pm

jizzbantam wrote:Shut up you old moaners with your sad hidden agenda crap.

He had a good footballing brain but was weak, he wasnt good enough.

He's only played 14 times for Mansfield this season.


yeah but the stags would beat the Bantams at the moment
User avatar
shartle_861
 
Posts: 6182
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:23 pm
Location: A hundred plus miles away from VP

Next

Return to Bradford City Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 4 guests